Month: July 2013

Footed

The left won the French cantonal and municipal elections of 9 and 16 March. The advantage is not much (49.5% vs 47.5% of the vote), but the Socialists this have managed to consolidate in their two big mayoralties (Paris and Lyon) and snatch right of Toulouse, Strasbourg, Reims, Metz, Amiens, Caen, Angers, Saint Etienne, Blois and Angouleme. The Gaullists, however, retained Marseille, the second city of the Republic. For social democracy, this is important because they show his first victory in a long time since they lost before the elections both for municipalities nationwide, as well as the last two legislative and presidential last three. France, like Spain, showed the tendency to go towards the bipolarization between Socialists and centroderechistas, in favour of the first. Bayrou, who wanted to encourage a strong pole of Center, failed to be elected and their democratic movement was strangled. The far right and the hard left lost weight.

This is the first electoral setback for Sarkozy, who makes months He was a right-wing majority in presidential elections and also parliamentary. He promised a turn in the Gallic conservatism. During the docenio of Chirac (1995-2007) France resisted to diplomacy and the economic model Americans, but Sarkozy raises dismantle both social protectionism and move closer to Bush. However, in ten months in power Sarkozy has been wasting his image due to the crisis of the economy and their own environment. This defeat is not Sarkozy’s Waterloo but this will encourage members to resist his monetarist reforms. European conservatives want to stop that streak in favor of the Socialists in Spain and France in 45 days London when choose Mayor. While Red Ken wants to follow the path of his Delano comrade who won re-election in Paris, British polls nationally give labour its worst percentage in 25 years: 16 points under the tories. Original author and source of the article.

{ Comments are closed }

The Tactile

On the relationship between visual and tactile system we see both senses relate and operate independently, when missing a sense such as view as shown in the film are developed more to those who are in contact with external reality, taking into account that the visual system is one which extends beyond the body we can say that the relationship between the two depends on development that possess each of them and since law of gestalt where we only associate concepts more not impulses caused by the stimulus, for example it is easy to determine with the touch sense a soft texture that is worth mentioning that the protagonist at the moment discriminate new information received through the visual system fails it interpret IO with the visual sense, applying it under the new parameters that represents the perception of visual information. Relationship between visual and tactile concept images: when we speak of concepts must be clear This is a hypothetical construction of what we perceive, therefore becomes evident that when the protagonist of the film at first sight sees the world from a strictly conceptual construction and tiltil, as before mentioned the concept of can of soda, do not have any kind of relationship with the concept that we handle literally, our single brain relates them when they involved the sensesin this case the tactile sense and the visual, if touch the object X we’ve ever seen can not define it unless we let’s get it with a previous concept. The perceived images or constructions. The image of a single object can be defined if we have perceived it with the totality of our perceptual systems, an image by itself does not represent any concept in our brain. The difference between view and look at is that when we see with our eyes, it is when they collect the information from the environment that surrounds us, itself, analogous function as a camcorder camera which captures the signals emitted by phenomena such as reflectance, brightness, depth perception of forms etc., as we have mentioned than perceived if images do not represent the reality, because it is our brain that look, this is the one that interprets the information, we see clearly when the protagonist sees the Apple in a printed magazine mode and when looks it like he is really thisWhen the touch Apple can say that it is because it has prior information (tactile memory) that does not have visual information and cannot define unlike. The experience and perception as the film clearly shows how the lack of visual experience distorted conception of the world, those who have the sense of sight intact we can define an object under the same parameters because we have experience that has shaped and defined our concepts. In all the examples such as Tin, truck in motion, Apple, art conception, the recognition of faces, even tonality and the perception of background, are modeled by the experience because it is clear that for us it is normal, as opposed to the protagonist that when she sees for the first time does not recognize or process information. Original author and source of the article.

{ Comments are closed }