These are criteria that must be chosen in my opinion so, because target is not a detailed individual assessment, but many good weighted tariffs, because only so can be newspapers to the customer and sell reprints to many policyholders. It is also not surprising that a tariff which is “Winner”, which not even provides services for end of life preservation resource containing no reasonable foreign regulations (or how to explain it the protection ends after 2 months abroad, although I can not return for medical reasons?) Also stays in joint institutions are not regulated, what happens if I want to go there / have and my insurance company the rehabilitation / consecutive treatment will not pay? In a pattern analysis you can see here how many different criteria there are here considered will need to / should. Deliberately, no fares are specifically named. That’s too little, because the selection and the importance of each criteria individually and very speziellist. Can a tariff which is good for one, as well as a smart or be totally unsuited to a van for the other. Evaluate which companies also ratings the same purpose. The positive assessment is publish, or have ever advertise companies with bad ratings see? Logically, it would not really help.
Therefore you will not publish them, finally one has paid them and can affect the use and publication. Before you so leave that are made on ratings and evaluations for a wide mass, find a suitable consultant, explain that your car selection criteria and what is important to you personally. Can a smart or be the described van with 8 seats – depending. And because you otherwise very long term decide for the PKV as in the car, take sufficient time, compare and analyse with a consultant specializing here and thus find the appropriate tariff.