According to Marx, separates the worker of the means of production. Which not owns and suffers from withdrawal, a sense of importance and a failure to identify positively with their work. Since then, this has also been concern among critical scholars of the behavior in the present, leading to inquire concerning man’s relationship with the organization that works and social. In this way, there is the responsibility of the teacher responsible for providing these skills, motivate, provide participants in not to neglect the role of the individual in the stage where works and especially try to conduct research that allow to give a diagnosis is like the current behavior in the enterprises of the region before the intervention of the State has been declared Socialist and has given way to new sharesprograms politicians, economic that they have had serious repercussions on the organizational climate of many enterprises, especially SMEs. Do not forget, that the term man organizational, as mentioned by the author cited (1975) has become common since the revelation of Whyte about the pressures toward conformity between executives of medium type. These executives not only work for the Organization, but that belong to it are as add Tannebaum, our class media have left their homes, both in physical form as a spiritual, to make the votes in the life of the Organization and are the mind and the soul of our great institutions. However primarily mentioned, is worth adding and highlighting, that theme of man versus organization was raised to psychologists for many years by f.
H. Allport, who emphasized the importance of individual differences in personal characteristics of the members of the organization. Argyris reminds us, that there are many people who have degrees of a trait which cannot express themselves if the person acts obediently toward the in accordance with the general scheme of conformism or institutional requirements. For this reason, social standardization means to stifle individual biological differences which are in operation; very acute problem for those who are trying to adapt their personal characteristics that appear as deviations from the system… Industrial machinery, which leads the institutional form, until the highest point to agree with the standardization of machinery, is an extreme example. The pains and stresses experienced by the workers-that perhaps you yourself has experienced, suffered – in their efforts to adapt their individual differences to these standard requirements, play its role in the well-known occupational neurosis. Perhaps to one lesser extent, the same problem arises in most of our businesses and in professional life, you probably know of some cases or in your same company these situations occur. Tannebaum adds us that management do not forget to and consider, that the personal needs of the members can be reconciled with the main purposes and requirements of the Organization and all conflicts can be solved in a comprehensive way.